[78-L] Warning..offensive article leads to offensive postings ^

[rjh334578gmail]

Mine is a similar situation with Yahoo - never did get it back on.  
Problem now however is it was my main pipeline and where all the  
archives of topics I wanted to save still reside.

Oh yes, by the way, back on topic, I scoped out the racism discussion  
on ol' bookface and discovered it was no better than what transpired  
here - just more of it - with faces.

That author really is chronocentrist to the max.  I mean, giving a kid  
ice cream may well seem as irresponsible in fifty years as coon songs  
seem to him now. The times, they are a-changin.  Maybe I'm just old  
enough to see it.

Sent from my iPod - which explainz any bad typjng


On May 21, 2014, at 8:13 PM, David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca>  
wrote:

>
> I never managed to get Yahoo back on with 78-L messages. Needed it  
> only as a
> backup about 10 years ago and frankly I don't want it  
> back..everything else
> over there is also screwed up.
>
> dl
>
> On 5/21/2014 9:09 PM, Ron Fial wrote:
>>
>> No, haven't fixed it yet -- still trying.
>>
>> Will change the from address so that the address will end  
>> with .invalid
>> For instance, an email from a yahoo member will say:
>>      From:  person at yahoo.com.invalid
>>
>> So we know who sent the email, but ISPs won't reject it because it  
>> did not
>> originate from a yahoo.com IP address.  That is what I am fighting,
>> this new kind of reject based on the From: address.
>>
>> In order to test the fixes, I have to turn off the anonymity stuff,  
>> but
>> am not yet successful in getting the .invalid to append.  I am  
>> getting
>> closer, tho :)  While I have anonymity turned off for testing,
>> about 50 members won't have their email delivered to all members,  
>> some
>> of it will bounce.  Temporarily allowing lots of bounces.
>> Most other domains are OK, google.com is golden, I love them.
>> Will get his fixed SOON!
>>
>> @*($&#*&&   <--(how I feel about Yahoo breaking mailing lists  
>> worldwide)
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Ron Fial   78-L list manager
>> ____________________________________________
>>
>> At 05:55 PM 5/21/2014, you wrote:
>>
>>> So it would appear! Thanks, Ron!
>>>
>>> dl
>>>
>>> On 5/21/2014 8:13 PM, DAVID BURNHAM wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From the last few comments it looks like Ron may have fixed the  
>>>>> annonimity problem!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l