[78-L] Edmond O'Brien (and this DOES have 78rpm
david.diehl at hensteeth.com
david.diehl at hensteeth.com
Fri Oct 4 16:27:36 PDT 2013
a Mercury ad in Billboard Jul 20, 1946 refers to "An album of Love Poems by Edmund O'Brien..." This is far too early to be a reissue of a Majestic recording. Bob Porter's Majestic master list has nothing remotely resembling this set.
DJD
Visit the Blue Pages: the Encyclopedic Guide to 78 RPM Party Records
http://www.hensteeth.com
-----Original Message-----
From: David Lennick [mailto:dlennick at sympatico.ca]
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 04:39 PM
To: '78-L Mail List'
Subject: Re: [78-L] Edmond O'Brien (and this DOES have 78rpm
On 10/4/2013 5:32 PM, David Lewis wrote:> David Lennick wrote:>> Duhhh..so these are Mercury 78s! Not Majestic! Sorry about that. And now, to> complete the tale, here are the listings as on the LP and with the authors named.>>>>>>> No, they were definitely recorded for, and originally published by, Majestic. The reason> they do not show up in Ty's site is that they were recorded as part of an album set, and the> issue numbers fall within a range that is not accounted for there. I don't know what that> range is, or what number set this is; I was able to trace the Majestic sets up through number> 16 and that's all I know at the moment.>> Uncle Dave Lewis> uncledavelewis at hotmail.com> > ____________________________So how come they DO show up on Ty's site on the Mercury pages as album A-15, discs 1016-8? Or should these in fact be under Majestic? Or did Mercury reissue them as 78s..but those numbers are way too low!LP follows the order of the matrix numbers, incidentally, and not the 78rpm sequencing.dl_______________________________________________78-L mailing list78-L at klickitat.78online.comhttp://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
More information about the 78-L
mailing list