[78-L] Decca take markings

[David Lennick]

Pretty sure that's what I said, or implied.

On 3/11/2013 2:31 PM, Michael Biel wrote:
   BUT the
> T-numbers are not take numbers.  They are TRANSFER numbers.
>
> Mike Biel  mbiel at biel.com
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Decca take markings
> From: David Lennick<dlennick at sympatico.ca>
> Date: Mon, March 11, 2013 11:47 am
> To: 78-L Mail List<78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>
> Same takes, different cutting tables. (The impossible possibility of
> "pstereo"
> can be debated amongst you, and while you're at it, deal with Capitol's
> 'L' and
> 'R' takes.) Different dubs from the same master occur after 1943 (they
> didn't
> go to 16-inchers until during the ban, when they bought World's
> facilities) and
> are indicated by T- and a number. Even then, I've found supposedly
> identical
> takes that are different (Many a New Day, from Oklahoma, has audible
> vocal
> differences in two copies I've had).
>
> dl
>
> On 3/11/2013 11:37 AM, Bryan Wright wrote:
>> On US Decca pressings of the early 1940s, what is the difference
>> between takes designated "-A" and "-AA"? Are these different takes
>> entirely, or simply different dubbings from the same lacquer master?
>> (I'm assuming Decca was mastering on oversize lacquers by then?)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bryan W.
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>