[78-L] well, no one's ever mourned a critic

[Mike Harkin]

'Tis indeed!  Probably where I remembered the Reger shtik from.



--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Nathan Coy <nathanpcoy at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Nathan Coy <nathanpcoy at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [78-L] well, no one's ever mourned a critic
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 8:53 PM

This one is always a fun book to have on the shelf.

http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/615276

Nathan

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Mike Harkin <xxm.harkin at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Max Reger is said to have sent a letter to a particularly vile critic:  "I am in the smallest
> room in my house.  I have your criticism before me.  Soon it will be behind me."  Probably
> where most criticism ends up, so to speak.
>
> Mike in Plovdiv
>
> --- On Fri, 3/1/13, Philip Carli <Philip_Carli at pittsford.monroe.edu> wrote:
>
> From: Philip Carli <Philip_Carli at pittsford.monroe.edu>
> Subject: Re: [78-L] well, no one's ever mourned a critic
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 7:13 PM
>
> I wouldn't dispute your own deriving entertainment from his work, but I would shy from personally extending it as a general premise.  I've ploughed through those three volumes, as until recently there's been very little easily accessible collected late-Victorian music criticism, and found considerable viciousness and pretension rather than insight; if he hadn't become a successful playwright ("there's a very good word called 'dramatist'", wrote W. S. Gilbert with some irritation when he was knighted as a "playwright", but I won't apply it to Shaw) his criticism would be buried with Louis Engel's and James Davison's, and certainly not given the unmerited weight by historians that it has been.  I'm not fond of Shaw in any medium except his 1928 Movietone short film appearance.  PC
> ________________________________________
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com [78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] on behalf of Don Cox [doncox at enterprise.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 1:29 PM
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Subject: Re: [78-L] well, no one's ever mourned a critic
>
> On 01/03/2013, Philip Carli wrote:
>
>> You have to do something else rather just criticism to be mourned, I
>> think. If Shaw had remained only a music critic, he would not only be
>> unmourned, but rightfully reviled. He was mostly malicious rather than
>> constructive. PC
>
> But very entertaining to read.
>
> ("Shaw's Music", 3 thick paperback volumes.)
>
> Regards
> --
> Don Cox
> doncox at enterprise.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email message and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using the information in any way, including but not limited to disclosure of, copying, forwarding or acting in reliance on the contents. If you have received this email by error, please immediately notify me by return email and delete it from your email system. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l