[78-L] question for dance band experts

[Taylor Bowie]

I love the entire balance of that record...it has such a warm sound,  the 
sax section and the solos are miked so well.

Live music is best,  for sure,  but some things can be captured on record 
which might be harder to appreciate "in person."

Taylor



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Huskisson" <timhuskisson at btinternet.com>
To: "'78-L Mail List'" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] question for dance band experts


> Interesting. I never noticed that before and yet it's very audible.
>
> "...My favorite banjo-and-guitar record would have to be the Goldkette of
> Clementine,  where there is a seamless transition from Qucksell's banjo 
> when
> the sax chorus begins,  which is backed by Lang's guitar."
>
> Taylor
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Huskisson" <timhuskisson at btinternet.com>
> To: "'78-L Mail List'" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [78-L] question for dance band experts
>
>
>> Although it is true that the Tuba and Banjo both recorded better than
>> String
>> Bass and Guitar, I think live performance instrumentation was pretty much
>> the same as that used in studios, though sometimes bands were augmented
>> with
>> extra musicians for recording (eg. strings). There are plenty of photos 
>> of
>> Dance bands in their resident surroundings (Hotels, etc).
>>
>> What is interesting however is the possibility that the use of
>> Tuba/Sousaphone may have become widely used in live performance AS A
>> RESULT
>> OF THE POPULARITY OF THE SOUND heard on records. i.e. If the phonograph
>> hadn't been invented, perhaps arrangers would have preferred to write for
>> String Bass. Electric recording seems to have begun the gradual
>> transformation from Brass bass back to String bass.
>>
>> It's also interesting to note that in many small groups - notably the
>> Original Dixieland Jass Band - No Bass instrument was considered
>> necessary -
>> either in live performance or on record. The Piano did all the work!
>>
>> Tim Huskisson
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
>> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of
>> neechevoneeznayou at gmail.com
>> Sent: 24 October 2012 14:00
>> To: 78-l
>> Subject: [78-L] question for dance band experts
>>
>> I'm thinking about acoustic dance bands. When they performed live in the
>> day, did they use the same instrumentation as they used for recordings,
>> such
>> as tubas for the low end, or did they have other instruments, such as
>> string
>> bass?
>>
>> I am thinking that they used more conventional instrumentation for live
>> performances, whatever that would be. Same as classical performances.
>> Would appreciate a confirmation or correction.
>> --
>> Joe Salerno
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2013.0.2741 / Virus Database: 2616/5850 - Release Date: 10/23/12
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2741 / Virus Database: 2616/5851 - Release Date: 10/24/12
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>