[78-L] Pathe 29017 or 30149 ?
Ron L'Herault
lherault at bu.edu
Wed Oct 10 19:11:11 PDT 2012
Of course that is assuming the Pathe is a vertical cut disk (red rooster on
label?). The laterals are usually marked
"Needle cut" or something like that and are on the Pathe Actuelle label.
Etched label Pathes start inside, at least the few that I have do.
Ron L
-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Robert M. Bratcher
Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:51 PM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] Pathe 29017 or 30149 ?
Yes I know about wiring a stereo cartridge for vertical & thanks for the
stylus info.
>________________________________
>From: Ron L'Herault <lherault at bu.edu>
>To: '78-L Mail List' <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:39 PM
>Subject: Re: [78-L] Pathe 29017 or 30149 ?
>
>You have to wire your stereo cartridge to respond to the vertical
>component only for best results. I think its the Left hot with right
>ground but I'll leave that to others to confirm or correct. Using a
>large stylus is helpful to but not entirely necessary.
>
>Ron
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
>[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Robert M.
>Bratcher Jr.
>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:33 PM
>To: 78-L Mail List
>Subject: Re: [78-L] Pathe 29017 or 30149 ?
>
>Whats on the record? Have you played it? Oh & whats the best way to
>play a Pathe on an electric turntable?
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>>From: Clifford Bolling <78records at cdbpdx.com>
>>To: 78-l Online <78-l at 78online.com>
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:16 PM
>>Subject: [78-L] Pathe 29017 or 30149 ?
>>
>>I have a 29cm Pathe with 30149 A / 30149 B in the dead wax but
>>stickers on
>the labels covering the printed catalog number that says 29017 on both
>A and B sides. Don't want to try to remove the sticker to see what's under
it.
>Can't find a discography to identify either catalog number, so I don't
>know which is correct or if both numbers are correct. Any ideas? Thanks!
>>
>>Cliff
>>_______________________________________________
>>78-L mailing list
>>78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>>http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>78-L mailing list
>78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>_______________________________________________
>78-L mailing list
>78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
More information about the 78-L
mailing list