[78-L] Alternate takes?

[leonard schwartz]

i have 2 ..one by leo reisman and one by earl burtnett..
 
lenny
 

________________________________
 From: GAVIN WHITELAW <gavw at btopenworld.com>
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [78-L] Alternate takes?
  
I have a few unissued Harry Roy 10" test pressings from his own collection. Alternate takes of issued discs.


Gavin R Whitelaw 

For vintage images from the 20th Century visit my website at
 
www.vintage-images.co.uk

Harry Roy, one of the great Dance Band leaders of the 1930s and 40s
 
www.harryroy.co.uk 
 


________________________________
From: Milan P Milovanovic <milanpmilovanovic4 at gmail.com>
To: 78-l at 78online.com 
Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2012, 3:19
Subject: [78-L] Alternate takes?

Alternate takes?

Dear members,

listening to jazz music a lot, I always wonder how alternate takes or breakdown takes survived till nowadays. OK, it is clear to me that after 1939 or so they used 16" lacquers for master recording machine (and later on they transfer successful takes to 10" discs).

But, how about before that? Why on earth will anyone keep, electroplate and press non finished fragments - I think that it wasn't so cheap to do such processing? Also, was main purpose of getting alternate takes possibility to get another set of mother/father/stampers, or these were only to producer choice what to put on final finished record? I know about that Armstrong case where both takes were issued on various labels - but is it exception or there were some more examples of such procedure?

Thanks in advance,

Milan
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l