[78-L] Ted Weems alternate take

[Robert M. Bratcher Jr.]

Here's the 1929 Ted Weems 78. The record is a bit worn but still listenable.....
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b085U3yThzI&feature=relmfu



>________________________________
>From: Taylor Bowie <bowiebks at isomedia.com>
>To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
>Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:34 PM
>Subject: Re: [78-L] Ted Weems alternate take
>
>Differences are mostly in the solos...the YouTube version's solos are both a 
>little more rough and a little more imaginative.  Also a few very slight 
>changes in the ensemble.
>
>Not radical....but enough to notice.
>
>Taylor
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Julian Vein" <julianvein at blueyonder.co.uk>
>To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:23 AM
>Subject: Re: [78-L] Ted Weems alternate take
>
>
>> On 12/04/12 07:46, Taylor Bowie wrote:
>>> I happened to hear this on YouTube and noted that it's not the very 
>>> familiar
>>> take on the 78 issue.
>>>
>>> Or...was this take issued in some form on 78?  Rust notes "Take Two" and 
>>> no
>>> others.
>>>
>>> Any info appreciated.
>>>
>>> http://youtu.be/2QlyPPlvaBU
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks from Taylor
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>> I don't have the 78, but have it on TOM and Grannyphone LPs, the latter
>> given as -2. I tried comparing all three but, because my PC is on a
>> different floor from my turntable, it's a bit difficult to do. What are
>> the main differences?
>>
>>      Julian Vein
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>78-L mailing list
>78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>
>