[78-L] whats the best way to clean the lazer in a cd player

[Ron L'Herault]

It is not a question of sounding better.  The slower burn speeds I believe
make more distinct and well formed pits which can be more accurately read by
the laser.

Ron L

-----Original Message-----
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
[mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of leonard schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 2:14 PM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] whats the best way to clean the lazer in a cd player

let me ask u a question..does this slower speed thing really matter?i mean
78s have limited sound anyway..how much better can this slower make them
sound anyway?i mean u might be rite but im just curious..what should i use
inplace of nero? something free..
 

________________________________
 From: Don Cox <doncox at enterprise.net>
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] whats the best way to clean the lazer in a cd player
  
On 10/04/2012, Ron L'Herault wrote:

> I use minimum and then test the CD on a 20+ year old Radio Shack CD 
> player. If they work there, I'm pretty certain they'll work anywhere.
> The lasers get a bit tired as they age (don't we all) and won't pick 
> up CDs burned in a computer rapidly in my experience.
> 
A good method, I think.

Regards
--
Don Cox
doncox at enterprise.net

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l