[78-L] whats the best way to clean the lazer in a cd player

[Robert M. Bratcher Jr.]

Those are rated 52x but I'd still prefer to burn them (my choice) at either 16 or 24x. Haven't used Gigaware brand DVDR's & CDR's for a long time. They all burned well.



>________________________________
>From: leonard schwartz <coonsanders at yahoo.com>
>To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 2:07 PM
>Subject: Re: [78-L] whats the best way to clean the lazer in a cd player
>
>well im using the radio shake brand..gigaware the numbers are 700mb/80 minates..what speed r these then?
>
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Alan Bunting <alanbuntinguk at yahoo.com>
>To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com> 
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 3:02 PM
>Subject: Re: [78-L] whats the best way to clean the lazer in a cd player
>  
>The speed to use depends on what speed(s) the blanks you are using are optimised for - using too low a speed can result in as many problems as too high a one.  You should also ensure that, for the speed you use, your hard drive can deliver the data to the burner without having to resort to buffer underrun protection.
> 
>There are still a few companies I make masters for who don't want the master as a DDP file and I always use Tayo Yuden blanks which, although rated at up to 52x, I always record at 16 times speed.  99 times out of a 100, when the master is checked for errors there are no C2 or CU errors at all and for C1 errors a maximum of 25 per second with and an average of 0.5 or less is the norm (the Red Book standard allows for up to 220 per second) 
> 
>I certainly wouldn't burn at any speed higher than 24 times, other than for quick tests and listening copies and if you want consistently good results then invest in a premium quality burner, such as Plextor.
> 
>Also remember that, no matter how perfect your recording, even slight specks of dust and especially finger marks can cause problems on playback, especially with CD-Rs which reflect less of the laser beam than a pressed CD. 
> 
>Alan Bunting 
>
>
>>________________________________
>>From: Robert M. Bratcher Jr. rbratcherjr at yahoo.com
>>
>>But some discs have 16x as the slowest speed listed in programs such as Imgburn. I guess you could burn them slower but 16 or 24x is enough for me & I get very good results for both speeds. No need to burn at 48 to 52x......
>>
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>78-L mailing list
>78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>_______________________________________________
>78-L mailing list
>78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>
>