[78-L] American Record Corp. staff photo

[Taylor Bowie]

I don't have my copy handy of the Thesaurus Dictionary of Phrases,  but are 
"needless fuss" and "conversation"  actually synonymous?

:-)





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Biel" <mbiel at mbiel.com>
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [78-L] American Record Corp. staff photo


> With all this needless fuss, did any of you record experts notice that
> the phonograph's photo was reversed in mirror image?
>
> Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [78-L] American Record Corp. staff photo
> From: bruce78rpm at comcast.net
> Date: Wed, December 21, 2011 1:47 pm
> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>
> I was not talking about a more "Fancy" presentation, but a more
> "Historically Accurate" one. Of course the item speaks for itself, and
> really did not need the cheap little 60's suitcase phono as an
> enhancement. But if you are going to include something with it, why not
> make if from the same era in question, including some nice
> representative labels that were issued by ARC during the same time
> period ? It certainly would have made for a better presentation.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Taylor Bowie" <bowiebks at isomedia.com>
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 12:29:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [78-L] American Record Corp. staff photo
>
> The seller may or may not be a history buff, but he is a seller, and
> offers a wide variety (currently hundreds of lots) of printed material
> for
> sale, with no records listed. For him, it's just another item to move
> along.
>
> I'm not sure what benefit he would receive from making a more fancy
> presentation of the photo...the item pretty well speaks for itself and I
>
> don't think whoever buys it will much care about the window dressing or
> that it would make for higher bidding in the end.
>
> Taylor
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <bruce78rpm at comcast.net>
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 6:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [78-L] American Record Corp. staff photo
>
>
>> The Seller, is obviously not a history buff, and his knowledge obviously
>> ends with the photo. Why in the world would you display a 1960's-70's
>> cheap little suitcase electric phonograph with a 45 rpm setting, next to
>> American Record Co. Employees photo from 1931 ? A nice collage of some of
>> ARC's many Record labels from the 1920's and early 30's would have been
>> much more appropriate, and historically correct. I just cringed when I 
>> saw
>> that little portable there with the photo, it just looks plain silly.
>> Unless you happen to be historically out of touch, like the seller. No 
>> big
>> deal I guess.
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "David Lennick" <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
>> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:57:33 AM
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] American Record Corp. staff photo
>>
>> I thought Capitol bought the Scranton plant.
>>
>> dl
>>
>> On 12/21/2011 1:35 AM, Cary Ginell wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't know the connection between ARC and Capitol (misspelled 
>>> "Capital"
>>> here) - they had nothing to do with each other. Still, a nice historical
>>> piece, if anyone can identify any of the folks in the picture. I sure
>>> can't.
>>>
>>> Cary Ginell
>>>
>>>> From: soundthink at live.com
>>>> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
>>>> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:31:40 -0800
>>>> Subject: [78-L] American Record Corp. staff photo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/1931-AMERICAN-RECORD-CORP-SCRANTON-PA-EMPLOYEE-PHOTO-CAPITAL-PREDECESSOR-/270816639601?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f0dedfa71
>>>>
>>>> It's too rich for my blood, but I'd sure love to see a closeup and try
>>>> and identify Art Satherley and Don Law in the photo.
>>>>
>>>> Cary Ginell
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>