[78-L] Interesting number sequence

[David Lennick]

According to Volume 1 of the Columbia Master Books, the 60000s presumably 
continued from the 33000s and were ten-inch trials and personal records. Not 
all the matrix series are outlined by Tim Brooks, definitely not the 205000s.

dl

On 9/17/2011 8:13 PM, Royal Pemberton wrote:
> Wasn't the 60000s of the time a personal record series?  One other jump I
> can think of is in the 10" series for pop/country/etc that jumped from 81999
> to 140000 on 11 September 1924.
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Han Enderman<jcenderman at solcon.nl>  wrote:
>
>> I see both mx series on some ethnic issues.
>> In the Co 57000-F series these mx series are consecutive, indeed.
>> Is anything known about the range of both mx series?
>> And was there a 60000 mx series already?
>>
>> But why did Co use several mx series at the time?
>>
>> han enderman
>> ===
>>>>> I have a record with two widely varied matrix numbers but they're
>> probably
>> sequential. Not in Spottswood, unfortunately, but nearby numbers are, in
>> both
>> cases, pointing to April 1925. Both are saxophone solos by Nathan Glantz.
>>
>> COLUMBIA 57015-F
>> W 59999-3       KOL NIDRE
>> W 205000-2      A GEBET TZUM RIBONO SHEL OILOM
>>
>> There, that oughta get me the ARSC Lifetime Achievement Award, the Nobel
>> Prize
>> for Obscurity, and a medium coffee and donut at Tim Horton's..
>>
>> dl
>> <<<
>> _______________________________________________
>> 78-L mailing list
>> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
>> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
>