[78-L] the original sound of the twenties --- lp

Royal Pemberton ampex354 at gmail.com
Sat May 28 08:53:26 PDT 2011


I wonder if they'd have noticed if the reverb would have been, strictly
speaking mono out of phase, so that people who listened in stereo would hear
the music in mono with a little reverb, but those who wanted to hear the
tracks in their pure state could switch to mono and make the reverb cancel
out?

On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mike Daley <mikedaley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is the use of reverb in reissues completely discredited by this point?
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:47 AM, David Lennick <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
> > On 5/28/2011 11:41 AM, Mark Bardenwerper wrote:
> >>
> >> Please tell us more of the experience. For instance what did you use for
> >> restoration in those days?
> >> I used to use a program called DART, but I think that was a little
> later.
> >>
> >
> > Digital schmigital! This was the late 80s/early 90s..EQ and razor blades.
> And
> > (unfortunately, but they wanted it in those days) some reverb from a nice
> > little unit I still own but haven't touched in years, called Accessit. It
> did a
> > nice job.
> >
> > dl
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 78-L mailing list
> > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>


More information about the 78-L mailing list