[78-L] Not innocuous, but inauspicious

[David Lennick]

Thought that was Noxious.

dl

On 3/3/2011 2:33 PM, Don Chichester wrote:
>
> It's a CD manufacturer.
>
> dc
>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:18:30 -0500
>> From: dlennick at sympatico.ca
>> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Not innocuous, but inauspicious
>>
>> So if inauspicious and auspicious are opposites, what constitutes nocuous?
>>
>> dl
>>
>> On 3/3/2011 10:06 AM, DanKj wrote:
>>> David is the only one to use the correct word: "inauspicious". None of
>>> these records are more "innocuous" than any others, unless we're talking
>>> about offensive, controversial, or dangerous records as opposed to
>>> "innocuous" records.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Lennick"<dlennick at sympatico.ca>
>>> To: "78-L Mail List"<78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Inocuous premieres
>>>
>>>
>>>> Not a band, but Bing Crosby (Decca): I Love You Truly&  Just A-Wearyin'
>>>> for You
>>>> (Decca 100, an inauspicious start for them as well)
>>>>
>>>