[78-L] Not innocuous, but inauspicious

[Don Chichester]

It's a CD manufacturer.
 
dc
 
> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:18:30 -0500
> From: dlennick at sympatico.ca
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Not innocuous, but inauspicious
> 
> So if inauspicious and auspicious are opposites, what constitutes nocuous?
> 
> dl
> 
> On 3/3/2011 10:06 AM, DanKj wrote:
> > David is the only one to use the correct word: "inauspicious". None of
> > these records are more "innocuous" than any others, unless we're talking
> > about offensive, controversial, or dangerous records as opposed to
> > "innocuous" records.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "David Lennick"<dlennick at sympatico.ca>
> > To: "78-L Mail List"<78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [78-L] Inocuous premieres
> >
> >
> >> Not a band, but Bing Crosby (Decca): I Love You Truly& Just A-Wearyin'
> >> for You
> >> (Decca 100, an inauspicious start for them as well)
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l