[78-L] Vitrolac: the spelling that would not die!

Philip Carli Philip_Carli at pittsford.monroe.edu
Mon Feb 14 21:31:19 PST 2011


I'm surprised that no-one so far has asked "Vy a duck? Vy-a no chicken?"

________________________________________
From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com [78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Steven C. Barr [stevenc at interlinks.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 12:29 AM
To: 78-L Mail List
Subject: Re: [78-L] Vitrolac: the spelling that would not die!

From: "DanKj" <MLK402 at verizon.net>
> I think most modern uses of Vitrolac can be traced to "The Fabulous
> Phonograph",  BUT Roland Gelatt shouldn't be blamed,
> because "Vitrolac" shows up even in RCA literature. It's now almost always
> without the c , the way other products are now
> always wrong ("duck tape" became "duct tape", even though it's useless on
> ducts! )
>
Other way around! It was originally known as "DUCT tape" and was used to
patch up
leaky joins in heating (et al) ducts. Since many cheaper and weaker versions
were
sold, it gradually became "duck tape" (the unanswered question being "WHO
needs to tape a duck...and to what/whom...?!).

Steven C. Barr

_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l

This email message and any attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from using the information in any way, including but not limited to disclosure of, copying, forwarding or acting in reliance on the contents. If you have received this email by error, please immediately notify me by return email and delete it from your email system. Thank you.


More information about the 78-L mailing list