[78-L] Kodak Photo-Flo 200, was Best way to clean 78s

[Doug Pomeroy]

Answer from Kodak about Photo-Flo 2000:

> Dear Doug,
>
> Thank you for contacting us for information as to the availability  
> of Kodak Photo-Flo 200 Solution.
>
> This product, catalog #146-4510, continues to be available through  
> any "Kodak Professional Authorized Dealer - Stockhouse".
>
> For a list, here's a link to our dealer locator on our website: http://www.kodak.com/go/proproductsnetwork
> Just enter a state abbreviation, rather than a city or zip code, to  
> broaden the search. Be sure to select "Kodak Professional Authorized  
> Stockhouse" for "Select a Product or Service".
>
> If the dealer does not have the item in stock, just give them the  
> catalog number and ask them to place an order for you.
>
> If there are no local dealers available, there are online retailers  
> that can provide wholesale pricing on volume purchases so check with  
> them for the best price and delivery options:
>
> East Coast:
> http://www.uniquephoto.com
> http://www.adorama.com
>
> Midwest:
> http://www.calumetphoto.com
> http://www.doddcamera.com
>
> West Coast:
> http://www.samys.com
> http://www.gassers.com
> http://www.glazerscamera.com
>
> I have seen no tested data that we did on using this to clean records.
>
> Please let us know if you have future questions on this or other of  
> our Kodak Professional products.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Peter V.
> Kodak Professional
> Technical Support
> 800-242-2424 ext. 19
>
>
> --Original Message--
> From: audiofixer at verizon.net
> Date: 12/31/2010 3:30:38 PM
> To: daitech at kodak.com
> Subject: Your question to Kodak Photo Paper
>
> UserEmail: audiofixer at verizon.net
> Product: Photo Paper
>
> First Name: Doug
> Last Name: Pomeroy
> Country: US
> Language: en
> Question: Kodak used to make Photo-Flo 2000, a wetting agent.  This  
> has apparently been discontinued (along with Kodak Lens Cleaner).
> Somewhere I read that Kodak issued a warning against using Photo-Flo
> to dry phonograph records after washing them.  Is this true?  I  
> realize you will find this to be a strange question(!), but what  
> else can I do?
> Subject of email: Other
> Serial or catalog number: n/a
> Product used in conjunction: None
> UI/Browser: Firefox
> Operating System: Mac OS X
> Platform/CPU:
> RAM:
> Internet Connection:
>
> Form Id: Printing Supplies







Begin forwarded message:

> From: Doug Pomeroy <audiofixer at verizon.net>
> Date: December 31, 2010 3:43:17 PM EST
> To: 78-list <78-L at klickitat.78online.com>
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Best way to clean 78s
>
>
> Very interesting - the article cited below states that Kodak once  
> warned against
> using "Kodaflow" (which is presumably Photo-Flo 2000) for use on  
> phonograph
> records.  I checked the Kodak web site to see if I could find that  
> warning, but
> it's not there, probably because both Photo-Flo and Kodak Lens  
> Cleaner are
> nowhere to be found - both have apparently been discontinued.
>
> Just for clarification, the Lens Cleaner (ammonium carbonate) was a  
> cleaner,
> but the Photo-Flo was simply a wetting agent (surfactant).
>
> DOug
>
>
>> Message: 12
>> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 19:06:24 -0600
>> From: Mark Bardenwerper <citrogsa at charter.net>
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Best way to clean 78s
>> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>> Message-ID: <4D1D2C90.80008 at charter.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> http://www.teresaudio.com/haven/cleaner/cleaner.html
>>
>> How 'bout this?
>>
>> -- 
>> Mark L. Bardenwerper, Sr. #:?)
>> Technology, thoughtfully, responsibly.
>> Visit me at http://www.candokaraoke.com

Doug Pomeroy
audiofixer at verizon.net


-------------- next part --------------