[78-L] Label scanning
Steven C. Barr
stevenc at interlinks.net
Mon Sep 20 18:45:11 PDT 2010
From: "Michael Biel" <mbiel at mbiel.com>
> Back in the 1970s and 80s when ARSC undertook the Rigler-Deutsch Record
> Index, a special microfilm camera was devised and built to photograph
> every pre-microgroove record in the member archives and create the data
> files from the films. The entire record was photographed twice, once
> lit to see the grooves and markings, and the other exposure lit and
> filtered to make the label readable. The company which designed the
> camera had put together a small record collection with every known label
> color combination and set up a lighting and filtering protocol for
> each. Remember, we are talking about black and white photography.
> The camera would be taken to the archive so that the records would not
> have to be shipped. In those ancient days before micro-computers, data
> entry for the huge mainframe computers was done on key-punch machines as
> big as a car. The data entry team did not have to handle the records.
> The other benefit is that the films exist, and I think each of the five
> original member libraries has a set. They also were available for sale
> for a few years and I wish I could have afforded them. In addition, the
> camera still exists. ARSC now owns it, and one of the libraries houses
> it.
> My major regret is that they did not follow my suggestion for
> ring-lighting which would have evenly lit the groove surface and make
> optical replay possible with the now emerging technology. Yes, this is
> something I had envisioned even that long ago.
>
To make things worse (much!), they then used low-paid student "help"
to transcribe the relevant data from the image archive into a functional
database...! As a result, much of the data is dubious and unreliable...
these students had minimal ability to locate/identify the relevant
data from the nicely-photographed image archive...?!
The applicable question here is whether a/the complete set of
images still exists?! If so, it sh/c/would be possible to assemble
a better database of information therefrom...?!
I was at the ARSC convention where the RD(R)I project was
first announced...in I recall that Len Kunstadt (of RR fame) was
appalled when he learned that "take" data was NOT going to
be included in the final result...?!
Steven C. Barr
More information about the 78-L
mailing list