[78-L] Whoopie Boop^

[David Lennick]

There was no sex until the Swedes discovered it in the fifties. We were all found under cabbage leaves. I know I was.

dl
 
> From: lherault at bu.edu
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:27:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Whoopie Boop^
> 
> Steven,
> 
> If you think sex didn't exist in old post-code (I imagine that is what you
> meant by "them days") you are not paying attention. There was plenty of sex
> it was just not thrust (pun intended) into your face at every turn. It was
> subtle, hinted at and given visual and/or verbal euphemisms. 
> 
> Ron L
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com] On Behalf Of Steven C. Barr
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:30 PM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Whoopie Boop^
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Julian Vein" <julianvein at blueyonder.co.uk>
> > Bill McClung wrote:
> >> The character that became Betty Boop first appeared in the cartoon "Dirty
> >> Dishes" in 1930 as a half-dog, half-human with no name.
> > ==============
> > Shouldn't that be "half-bitch"?
> >
> Virtually all cartoons...especially that long ago...specifically omitted any
> "anatomical details"...?! S*x didn't exist in movies...filmed or 
> drawn...back
> in "them days?!" There MAY have been illicit/unofficial "Betty Boop"
> films in which s*x was depicted; however AFAIK these were (like
> "party records"...?!) undocumented and quite possibly no longer exist?!
> 
> Steven C. Barr 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l