[78-L] Whiteman's"Sweet Sue"

david.diehl at hensteeth.com david.diehl at hensteeth.com
Wed Apr 7 20:17:35 PDT 2010


 >Correct..and the truncated version, which is in earlier issues of thealbum (I have it unlaminated), has a higher matrix number, 27xxxsomething.
I'd love to see that, both of mine (fine groove comlete and truncated) are 24050-1
In this case I'm not entirely opposed to editing
DJD

Visit the Blue Pages: the Encyclopedic Guide to 78 RPM Party Records
http://www.hensteeth.com
-----Original Message-----
From: David Lennick [mailto:dlennick at sympatico.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 11:07 PM
To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
Subject: Re: [78-L] Whiteman's"Sweet Sue"

Correct..and the truncated version, which is in earlier issues of the album (I have it unlaminated), has a higher matrix number, 27xxx something. The fine groove dub might have been an experiment which somehow got pulled into production in later issues (just to confuse US). In fact I never saw the edited version until about ten years ago, but I've had the complete version several times.dl > From: david.diehl at hensteeth.com> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:55:18 +0000> Subject: Re: [78-L] Whiteman's"Sweet Sue"> > We would have to get confirmation from the CBS files as to which dub was actually 'later' but the complete performance on fine-groove mx. has the typical early 1938 course-groove runout [just to confuse the tyros on the list;-]> DJD> Visit the Blue Pages: the Encyclopedic Guide to 78 RPM Party Records> http://www.hensteeth.com> -----Original Message-----> From: David Lennick [mailto:dlennick at sympatico.ca]> Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 10:46 PM> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com> Subject: Re: [78-L] Whiteman's"Sweet Sue"> > Correct. But it's not really the "later" fine groove dub since it was done before the issued version and somehow substituted in later issues of the album.dl > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 03:43:40 +0100> From: ampex354 at gmail.com> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com> Subject: Re: [78-L] Whiteman's"Sweet Sue"> > So does that mean the later fine-groove dub is not truncated, and presents> the complete performance?> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:35 AM, wrote:> > > Take a deep breath everybody. Now exhale slowly. "Sweet Sue" on Columbia> > 50103-D is take one. I have a copy in front of me. The dub of take one on> > red label Columbia exists in two forms with identical mx and take numbers:> > 24050-1. I have both copies in front of me. The original release is> > truncated as per Avakian's notes. Later copies are fine-groove dubs of the> > same take. What are the odds that you have discovered the find of the 21st> > century?> > ZERO!> > DJD> > -l > >> >> _________________________________________ _> _____> 78-L mailing list> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l _______________________________________________78-L mailing list78-L at klickitat.78online.comhttp://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l> _______________________________________________> 78-L mailing list> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l _______________________________________________78-L mailing list78-L at klickitat.78online.comhttp://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l



More information about the 78-L mailing list