[78-L] Whiteman's "Sweet Sue"

[David Lennick]

And mny albums aren't here yet and my books are, but the SHELVES aren't. The disc I played this evening was definitely take 1 and it was definitely different from the ten-inch dub, which I've known for decades. (The dub also exists in complete form with a different matrix number on all post-1941 pressings, which confused me mightily when I read George Avakian's note about "dropping the florid introduction" since the side ran 4:20.)

 

dl
 
> From: bowiebks at isomedia.com
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:29:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Whiteman's "Sweet Sue"
> 
> Both Rust and Evans/Dean-Myatt say that the red Columbia is a truncated dub 
> of Take 1, and that Takes 2-4 were rejected.
> 
> Are they wrong? My reference books are available but my 78 album sets are 
> pretty much all packed up.
> 
> Taylor
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Lennick" <dlennick at sympatico.ca>
> To: <78-l at 78online.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 7:56 PM
> Subject: [78-L] Whiteman's "Sweet Sue"
> 
> 
> >
> > My books are still packed away so I can't look this one up. Which take of 
> > Whiteman's "Sweet Sue" was reissued (on ten inch 78) in the Bix album? We 
> > were playing a few oldies on the Credenza tonight and the beat-up 
> > twelve-inch of Sweet Sue, Take 1, is definitely not the same take.
> >
> >
> >
> > dl
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 78-L mailing list
> > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l