[78-L] RCA Prefix Code

[Michael Biel]

> BOTH of them (there were two...the results look the same but the
> systems and "codes" are VERY different) were detailed in New
> Amberola Graphic many years ago...!  Steven C. Barr

The listing in New Amberola Graphic, which was also in Fagen and Moran
Vol 1, was INCORRECT because Ted Fagen believed what RCA handed him
without checking it.  What he received was the PROPOSED form.  Lennick
has already reposted the compilation that Joe Knox and I did. 

Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com 


  -------- Original Message --------
 Subject: Re: [78-L] RCA Prefix Code
 From: "Steven C. Barr" <stevenc at interlinks.net>
 Date: Tue, January 26, 2010 10:21 pm
 To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
 
 ----- Original Message ----- 
 From: "Michael Biel" <mbiel at mbiel.com>
 >I brought up the subject of the RCA prefix code on ARSCList but I do
not
 > have my sheets handy. I had done a full decoding a number of years
ago
 > on this list and I know a few of you have kept it. Can anybody repost
 > it? One or two corrections were made and I would hope that someone
 > has those with the list. It would be of interest to this list anyway,
 > and I would like to get it to the ARSCList people as well.
 > 
 
 _______________________________________________
 78-L mailing list
 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
 http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l