[78-L] TURNING THE TABLES, (was New Cheap Turntable
JD
jackson1932 at cfl.rr.com
Sun Jan 3 14:28:26 PST 2010
----- Original Message ----- > Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:43:12 -0600
> From: "Mark L. Bardenwerper, Sr." <citroenid19 at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [78-L] TURNING THE TABLES, (was New Cheap Turntable
> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Message-ID: <4B40F350.4060305 at sbcglobal.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> David Lennick wrote:
>> I wish you'd identify the turntable! No secret police on this list (he
>> said,
>> looking over his shoulder and under the bed). Of course DJ turntables are
>> meant
>> to play music where wow and flutter wouldn't make a bit of difference.
>> You
>> could also play twelve-tone music, Weill's "Mahagonny" and everything
>> recorded
>> by Joseph Szigeti after 1940 and never notice any problems....
>>
>
> I think I was told a while back the DJ turntables should not be
> construed as being high fidelity. They are designed to work in either
> direction for "scratching" and there is something in the geometry that
> makes them unsuitable for our use. Plus, a true lab device could not
> hold up to the hard use in a DJ environment. I cannot recall if it is in
> the arm design or the cartridge or both.
>
> --
> Mark L. Bardenwerper, Sr. #:?)
> Technology, thoughtfully, responsibly.
> Visit me at http://www.candokaraoke.com
>
The possibility of not meeting high fidelity standards is why I was
initially hesitant about considering the turntable. But as it was an obvious
clone of the Techics I figured it was worth a try if I could return it. I've
had plenty of experience with many brands of turntables including the
consumer line of Technics turntables, those with the standard "S" shaped
arms and those with the P-Mount arms (where the P-Mount (T4P) cartridge
plugs into the arm (no headshell) and they've all been excellent and
performed perfectly. When they first appeared some people tried to knock the
P-Mount concept but in my experience (and I can be quite critical) they did
a fine job and were a boon to anyone leery of mounting a phono cartridge and
going through the balancing-alignment routine. Mounting or changing a
P-Mount cartridge is as simple as it gets, removing a small screw in the
side of the arm head, plugging the cartridge into the open end of the arm
and replacing the screw which has a Phillips or cross-point head. That's it.
All P-Mount cartridges are designed to the same specs so no adjustments of
any kind are necessary although easy tracking force and anti-skating
adjustments are provided if the user feels the need to tweak them. The
cartridge mounting or change can be made even simpler (just loosening ans
NOT removing the set screw) if a tiny piece of plastic encircling where the
set screw passes throuch the mounting area of the cartridge is cut away from
the cartridge body with a razor or X-acto blade. My SLQX 300 is a TP4 and
I wouldn't part with it for anything. It's quiet, stable and has proven
itself for several decades now. If it had 78 speed it would be damn near
perfect.
The geometry you refer to as unsuitable most probably refers to the
"straight line" arms that were later incorporated into the "DJ" turntables,
some as a plug in extra and some as the integral arm. I've seen references
claiming that these are not intended or suitable for hi-fi reproduction.
Round & round we go......
JD
More information about the 78-L
mailing list