[78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records

[Don Chichester]

Why not just say, "Early 78s just had one side."

 

Don Chichester
 
> From: mbiel at mbiel.com
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:54:19 -0700
> Subject: Re: [78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records
> 
> From: Cary Ginell <soundthink at live.com>
> > I love their introduction to "How to collect 78 rpm records.
> > "Research the type of music that was recorded on 78 rpm records
> > as it is quite different from today's sounds. You will not be
> > finding any heavy metal or rap." 
> > I guess they're right. Aluminum-based discs are light metal.
> > Cary Ginell
> 
> But what about all those steel base discs during WW II??
> 
> Mike Biel mbiel at mbiel.com 
> 
> 
> > From: jeff at swazoo.com
> > Subject: [78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records
> > 
> > How interesting to learn that 78s could hold only one song because 
> > they had no grooves:
> > 
> > http://www.ehow.com/facts_5777428_difference-_amp_-33-rpm-records.html
> > 
> > - Jeff Lichtman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/