[78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records

[fnarf at comcast.net]

Those aren't really grooves, they're just, you know, suggestions. Where the needle might like to go.



----- Original Message -----
From: "simmonssomer" <simmonssomer at comcast.net>
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:37:18 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records

No grooves in 78's . Hmmmm.
So sez Yale University. 
I understand that many of our "intelligence" people attended that U.
As well as some political notables.
No names pliz.

Al S.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Lichtman" <jeff at swazoo.com>
To: <78-l at 78online.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:19 PM
Subject: [78-L] The difference between 78 and 33 RPM records


> How interesting to learn that 78s could hold only one song because 
> they had no grooves:
> 
> http://www.ehow.com/facts_5777428_difference-_amp_-33-rpm-records.html
> 
>                        -        Jeff Lichtman
>                                 jeff at swazoo.com
>                                 Check out Swazoo Koolak's Web Jukebox at
>                                 http://swazoo.com/ 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l