[78-L] Alex Steinweiss article

[Cary Ginell]

I'd like to see what it looks like. Can you send a scan? Can't seem to find an image on line.

Cary Ginell

> From: chaumelle at orange.fr
> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:51:00 +0100
> To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article
> 
> The two pictures are side by side on page 103. (1932/ 1941)
> 
> BC
> Le 28 déc. 09, à 23:23, fnarf at comcast.net a écrit :
> 
> > Oh, that's good. A credible secondary source discussing the material 
> > is BETTER than a primary source.
> >
> > The book is Miles Kreuger, Show Boat: The Story of a Classic American 
> > Musical. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977. Its library record 
> > says it's illustrated; I can't reserve books from that library so I 
> > can't tell if that includes a picture of the Brunswick artwork.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rodger Holtin" <rjh334578 at yahoo.com>
> > To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 1:58:34 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> > Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article
> >
> > Back about 1979 or so, Miles Krueger wrote a book about "Show Boat" 
> > (correct title escapes me - published by Oxford University Press or 
> > somebody like that)  and he discussed the original 1932 Brunswick 
> > album with its original artwork and compared it to the Columbia 
> > re-issue with Steinweiss artwork.  While this is not primary source 
> > material, it is a credible, published reference, probably still 
> > available somewhere, and reinforces the concept we are trying to 
> > re-establish.
> >
> > Rodger
> >
> >
> >
> > For Best Results use Victor Needles.
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> > --- On Mon, 12/28/09, fnarf at comcast.net <fnarf at comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > From: fnarf at comcast.net <fnarf at comcast.net>
> > Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article
> > To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> > Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 2:20 PM
> >
> > This is important! While the ramblings of a delightful bunch of old 
> > coots is very enjoyable, it's not evidence. People saying "Steinweiss 
> > wasn't first" aren't any more reliable than people saying "Steinweiss 
> > was first" without some solid documentary proof. Without it, 
> > journalists and authors are right to ignore us.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Cary Ginell" <soundthink at live.com>
> > To: 78-l at klickitat.78online.com
> > Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 11:52:04 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada 
> > Pacific
> > Subject: Re: [78-L] Alex Steinweiss article
> >
> >
> > Liesl Bradner has asked me for permission to print my comments as a 
> > letter-to-the-editor, to be published in next Sunday's L.A. Times 
> > Calendar edition.
> >
> > ...  ...   ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 78-L mailing list
> > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > 78-L mailing list
> > 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> > http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/