[78-L] Early portable electric recording?

Dave Murray dave at spectacularopticals.com
Fri Dec 18 10:24:01 PST 2009


Thanks for the info Doug!
The recording expedition I'm researching was in Asia in 1927....it's  
hard to believe they could have hauled something as large as the  
setup Peer used.
The smaller, spring driven set up sounds more likely...but would  
recordings still be "orthophonic"?


Dave


...................................................

I don't know of any photos of the whole rig, but it was
big and quite heavy according to producer Ralph Peer
who took it on his field trips for Okeh and Victor.
It consisted of a turntable connected by belt to a
gravity-driven motor, which required a tall structure
to support the falling weight. It required AC power
for the amplifiers from a power company. The condenser
microphone required 200 Volts DC, which was supplied
by five 22.5 Volt batteries in series, plus a 6 Volt storage
battery for the tube filament. These batteries were extremely
heavy.  Also needed was an oven with which to
pre-heat the wax. Peer complained that he could
barely get all  this in his car!

This info is from a tape recording Peer made some years
before his death, and I believe it can also be found in
the book THE BRISTOL SESSIONS, by Charles K Wolfe
and Ted Olson (McFarland & Co., 2005, paperback).

Alan Lomax also wrote about the recording gear he
used on his trips through the South - I don't believe he
ever used Western Electric equipment.

So, for recordings in the field, where there was no
AC power, and no place to set up the huge gravity-driven
motor, other recorders would have been used, for
sure. Peer mentions that it would have been far
simpler for him to use a much smaller spring-driven
cutter, but he declined because the speed stability
was poor.

I believe Presto made small battery powered
recorders which cut lacquer discs, but that had
to await development of lacquer discs, which
wasn't until late 1934.

Doug



More information about the 78-L mailing list