[78-L] 1934 Stop-Upton Sinclair shorts (Was: A word of warning. . .)

[jeffrey smedbron]

Time magazine was and still is whatever management thinks it needs to be to sell the most copies. 

Jeff S 



----- Original Message ----
From: simmonssomer <simmonssomer at comcast.net>
To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 6:58:05 AM
Subject: Re: [78-L] 1934 Stop-Upton Sinclair shorts (Was: A word of warning. . .)

Well, Time Magazine supported Franco in those years.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Biel" <mbiel at mbiel.com>
To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:34 AM
Subject: Re: [78-L] 1934 Stop-Upton Sinclair shorts (Was: A word of warning. 
. .)


> Steve Shapiro <steveshapiro1 at juno.com>wrote:
>>> Has anyone ever reissued the Hollywood shorts from 1934 slicing
>>> Upton Sinclair to shreds?/steve
>>> http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1988/6/1988_6_34.shtml
>>> http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,748070,00.html
>
> WOW!  What a story!  I had never heard about this before.  And we think
> that political campaigns are dishonest now!  Actually I am most
> surprised that the Time magazine article was not more slanted against
> Sinclair.  This puts a whole new light on the non-depression escapist
> films of the 30s.  How did they ever get to do "Grapes of Wrath" with
> schmucks like Mayer running the studios?

Well, Time Magazine supported Franco, Lindberg and all "America First".

Al S. groups.


_______________________________________________
78-L mailing list
78-L at klickitat.78online.com
http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l