[78-L] Climax record abrupt start
David Lennick
dlennick at sympatico.ca
Mon Dec 14 06:19:37 PST 2009
I've had the occasional very early Columbia that seemed to start with less than
half a revolution and before the cutter had even determined an even depth.
dl
Bryan Wright wrote:
> I just picked up a Climax Double Disk record (K412), one side of which
> uses Columbia matrix 532-2, a xylophone solo by Charles Lowe of
> "Suwannee River" [sic] recorded January 1902. I was surprised when
> starting the record to hear that the beginning of the recording is
> clipped. I place the needle at the very start of the groove, but the
> piano introduction is already in progress. I'm wondering if this might
> have originally been an announced record (mentioning Columbia at the
> start) and perhaps the Climax "reissue" I have had those first few
> revolutions of the groove polished away to remove the announcement?
> The record doesn't show any signs of tampering -- i.e., the outer edge
> looks like any other Columbia from the period, so any attempt to
> remove part of the groove must have been *very* well done. Does anyone
> have the original Columbia issue for comparison? Are clipped openings
> on Columbia-derived pressings such as this common?
>
> Bryan W.
> ____________________________
More information about the 78-L
mailing list