[78-L] Zonophone/ Harry Lauder Speed

[Michael Biel]

Don't forget that Lauder did a whole bunch of Edison cylinders and I 
recently got a whole slew of them.  That speed should be relatively 
accurate.

Mike Biel  mbiel at mbiel.com 


Thomas Stern wrote:
> iirc, Cheyne records (UK) did a CDr of
> the early Lauder recordings, I think they may indicate speed.  However, I
> tried
> to view their website, and can't get beyond the homepage - perhaps they are
> down for some reason.
> Anyone have their Lauder discs?
> Best wishes, Thomas.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com
> [mailto:78-l-bounces at klickitat.78online.com]On Behalf Of Matthew Duncan
> Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 1:50 PM
> To: 78-L Mail List
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Zonophone/ Harry Lauder Speed
>
>
> Does the disc designate 78 as the speed??
> I find 80-82 rpm plays my early Lauders and other pre 1920 discs pretty well
> although this is not correct right across the board...
>  
> Matt.
>
> --- On Sun, 23/8/09, agp <agp2176 at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
> From: agp <agp2176 at verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [78-L] Zonophone/ Harry Lauder Speed
> To: "78-L Mail List" <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
> Date: Sunday, 23 August, 2009, 4:45 PM
>
>
> At 15:27 23/08/2009, DL wrote:
>   
>> of those versions..or with the 1926 electrical (Victor 9012, HMV D-1277)
>>     
>
> I have Victor 9012, and that's how I made my determination. I also
> compared his voice to that of some Edison cylinders. Thanks for the info.
>
>
>
>   
>> Correction..it was recorded December 18, 1910 and the matrix number
>> is 12973e,
>> not 12978e. I don't know that song.
>>     
>
> You're right. Damn new bi-focals! I should have read it without the
> blasted things!
>
> T
>