[78-L] 78 rpm bandwidth
joe@salerno.com
jsalerno at earthlink.net
Wed May 27 15:05:14 PDT 2009
It seems to be a constant factor in recorded sound. Up until a certain
point in history, relatively recent at that, the hard part of the chain
is reproducing recorded sound, less so to record it. PB technology has
always been the limiting factor, not the recording technology.
joe salerno
David Lennick wrote:
> In fact, bass instruments are audible on Stokowski's first acousticals, but
> they couldn't be heard on playback instruments of 1917 so they were omitted
> from the orchestra for the rest of the acoustical era and into the first few
> months of electricals. I'm amazed that some of those earliest recordings, like
> Stoky's Marche Slav and the Victor Symphony Orchestra's "Petite Suite" (Bizet),
> were still in print in the mid 40s..probably kept there by the educational
> department, not by music lovers.
>
> dl
>
> I. Cubillo wrote:
>> From: "DAVID BURNHAM" <burnhamd at rogers.com>
>>> As far as acoustics are concerned they, of course, don't have the same low
>> end >content as even the earliest electrical recordings but I did find years
>> ago, when >playing with a parametric equalizer, I was able to exhort
>> substantial bass from a >Stokowski/Philadelphia recording, I think it was
>> the Prelude to Act I of Carmen.
>>
>>> db
>> I agree with David on the acoustics... the bass is not as poor as one could
>> believe. The trouble with the acoustics, roughly, is the lack of definition
>> in the treble, and the peak at 1000Hz, which is sometimes a bit disturbing.
>>
>>
>> Iñigo Cubillo
> _______________________________________________
> 78-L mailing list
> 78-L at klickitat.78online.com
> http://klickitat.78online.com/mailman/listinfo/78-l
>
More information about the 78-L
mailing list