[78-L] Fwd: Orthophonic label
S&R Pinsker
spinsker at erols.com
Mon Oct 6 15:03:11 PDT 2008
Begin forwarded message:
> From: S&R Pinsker <spinsker at erols.com>
> Date: October 6, 2008 5:12:13 PM EDT
> To: 78l at 78online.com
> Subject: Re: Orthophonic label
>
>
>>
>>
>> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:53:46 -0400
>> From: Michael Biel <mbiel at mbiel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [78-L] Orthophonic RecordLabel
>> To: 78-L Mail List <78-l at klickitat.78online.com>
>> Message-ID: <48E96FAA.7090109 at mbiel.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>>
>>> On 10/5/08, S&R Pinsker <spinsker at erols.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have some HMV LP's That have an
>>>> "Odeon" half label pasted over Little Nipper
>>>> and if I started to excavate could probably
>>>> find some other types of camouflage.
>>>>
>>
>> The Odeon stickers were a product of the Capitol of the World import
>> series done for the U.S. around 1963. I have the catalog. They
>> used a
>> golden foil with red printing sticker over the trademarks on the
>> jackets, and these were nearly impossible to remove cleanly.
>>
>>>> There was a time when the Customs Service
>>>> enforced trademark protection. Anyone
>>>> remember how many (rather, how few)
>>>> discs with Little Nipper a returning traveller
>>>> was allowed to bring into the country?
>>>> rdp
>>>>
>> Are you talking about the U.S. Customs Service? I don't think they
>> ever
>> were concerned with what an individual traveller would bring in,
>> only a
>> commercial firm.
> Yes.
> Enforcement may have been at the request
> of the trademark holder. What I remember is
> an article in one of the photo mags about
> Leica allowing exactly two trademarked items to be brought back into
> the U.S. That
> meant one camera body and one lens, not
> even a lens cap with the trademark. The
> suggestion was to put black tape over the
> trademarks.
>
>
>
More information about the 78-L
mailing list